2006
12.31
12.31
New version of FrequentZ already?! I had to fix it quickly since the first build was evidently horribly broken on all machines except my own. The lesson is: You can’t assume that declared memory locations will be sequential at run time. I know you x86 programmers are probably laughing at me right now but come on and fess up. You know you’ve done it too. This one seems to be working ok for now. E-mail me with bugs, crashes, suggestions or complaints.
- Get the source and binary here








No Comment.
Add Your Comment